
One hundred years ago, no one had any doubt that people
had inherited most of their character, as well as much of their
physical health, from their ancestors.
If someone suffered a stroke or heart attack at the top of the
family stairs at the age of 48 and went tumbling down them as a
result, it was assumed to be because of an inherited characteristic
or gene. Until the second half of the twentieth century, people
attributed their woes and vices to nature rather than nurture, to
inherited genes rather than environment or upbringing.
After the 1950s, environmental factors were considered
allimportant in the development of disease and the formation of a
personality. It wasn’t any longer thought that great
grandfather’s genes had caused the fatal tumble down the
stairs, but his couch potato life, his smoking and his love of rich
food. His aggressive personality with its mercurial temper and his
obsessional nature were also considered important factors in the
development of disease. The supporters of the nurture school in the
debate are especially determined that so far as psychiatric disease
and temperament are concerned, it is near hear say to suggest that
inherited factors have much to do with how people behave.
The pendulum has now swung some way back. Most doctors, together
with other workers in the medical field, believe that health is the
result of both nature and nurture and the interaction between them.
We now believe that many diseases, both physical and mental, are
not necessarily inherited but that a predisposition to develop them
is. If the genetic tendency is not too strong and we, for whatever
reason, live our lives unwisely, we may suffer problems with our
health. If on the other hand from an early age, possibly even from
the time in our mother’s womb, we have every advantage, we
may never show the signs of the condition.
Equally significantly, most doctors accept that however good
someone’s early upbringing and however wise his or her adult
life, the hereditary tendency is sometimes so strong that nothing
will totally eradicate inherent problems, it they may well modify
them. What is certain is that so far as inherited family health is
concerned, to be forewarned is to be forearmed. Furthermore, if
modifying lifestyle and supplementing diet are going to make a
difference, the sooner someone starts the better.
The heart, even if it is not the source of life, is the engine
which maintains it. If it begins to fail or the arterial system
becomes so clogged with fat that they no longer deliver an adequate
supply of oxygenated blood to reach vital organs, the length and
quality of life will be severely curtailed.
Nothing is more important in the pursuit of health than
preserving an efficient cardiovascular system and no aspect of this
matters more than the correct diet. It is accepted that as well as
a healthy diet those who are interested in their heart and arteries
should not smoke and that they should take at least thirty
minutes’ brisk walk every day. If someone is aware that his
or her family has a history of heart disease or has other risk
factors for developing heart disease, he or she should double the
amount of daily exercise.
People’s fat intake should be less than 30 per cent of the
total calories and less than a third of the total amount of fat
should be saturated, the type in butter, meat and biscuits. Having
five portions of fruit and vegetables a day is important. These
don’t have to be boring old faithfuls like cabbage and
broccoli, but can include exotic fruits and vegetables. The golden
rule is that the more highly coloured the vegetable, the greater
the likelihood that it has a high antioxidant content. Tomatoes,
peas, beans, peppers - both green and red - delicious small carrots
and tiny Scottish turnips - neeps - are all delicious. Lettuce is,
as the Americans say, a nutritional weakling. Potatoes don’t
count in the daily score. I always recommend a multi vitamin tablet
with added trace elements such as zinc, selenium and magnesium
daily to make up for any deficiencies in my diet or any failure of
my body to absorb them.
I never fail to tell patients about the need to achieve an
adequate intake of omega 3 and omega 6 and the correct balance
between them. I suggest they have oily fish twice a week but so as
not to take chances, they should also have fish oil capsules or cod
liver oil with a reduced vitamin A content daily. I also recommend
additional calcium and vitamin D to bolster the body’s
defences against osteoporosis. Osteoporosis affects both sexes but
doesn’t usually become apparent in men under 65. The tendency
to osteoporosis is inherited. Women should start taking precautions
against it before they reach the pre-menopausal years. As well as
having a diet rich in calcium, vitamin D supplements are also
recommended. This is especially important for those with an indoor
job. Weight-bearing exercise, such as brisk walking, is also
essential in the prevention of osteoporosis. Of the three
recommended forms of exercise - brisk walking, swimming and
bicycling - only walking is weight-bearing.
Some antioxidants are not only useful against possibly inherited
heart disease but also may protect against some cancers. Experts
believe that in a third of cases of cancer diet has played a factor
and that the recommended daily intake of fruit and vegetables could
dramatically reduce the incidence of some cancers, especially those
of the gut and prostate. Among these is the lycopene found in
tomatoes. It has been shown to be especially useful in reducing the
incidence of cancer of the breast and prostate. Lycopene capsules
daily, together with selenium, are important anti-cancer
agents.
Diet and the correct waistband aren’t only important in
the prevention of heart disease, strokes and cancer. There is good
observational evidence that omega 3 and the correct balance with
omega 6 help women to bear children who are brighter and certainly
remain so to primary school. Omega 3 also seems to be beneficial
for children who are hyperactive and even those who have ADHD.
There is some evidence that omega 3 reduces the incidence of
Alzheimer’s, but this may be a reflection of its effect on
the arteries leading to the brain.
back to the top »